Some Thesis Basics
(last update of specific examples for Chaucer sp. interim 2003)
Chaucer syllabus


Your thesis paragraph should open your essay.
Your thesis should make a clear statement of your argument
Your argument must be arguable (not obvious/ disprovable)

Formula Thesis
Your thesis should have the following elements (1-3)

1. Your thesis should make a clear textual claim (an observation about the text ).
Example: In the Wife of Bath’s Tale, Chaucer sets the Wife up in a seemingly contradictory position. She explicitly rejects the textual authorities on marriage and embraces her own authority based on her experience of five marriages; She then goes on to cite textual authorities throughout her Prologue.

2. Your thesis should make a clear interpretive claim based on the textual claim
Example: The Wife’s reliance on the citation of textual authorities even though she explicitly rejects textual authority, specifically masculine, clerical authority, can be viewed as reflecting the Wife’s inability to claim real authority through experience or as reflecting the rhetorical cunning of the Wife. In fact, her rhetorical stance against clerical authority is actually strengthened by her subsequent citation of textual authority because she disrupts the traditional meanings of those texts as she uses them for her own means.

3. Your thesis should argue for the importance of your interpretation and make a mapping claim giving an overview of the structure of your argument.
Example: That the Wife of Bath misquotes, misuses or misinterprets the textual authorities she uses is a well-known feature of the Wife’s Prologue. Claims have often been made that Chaucer paints the Wife as inconsistent, ignorant, and disorganized in her arguments. However, recently more efforts have been made to understand the Wife’s rhetorical style as more nuanced, starting from the position that the Wife may be more skilled in debate than critics have heretofore given her credit for. As a character that remains disconcertingly subversive on the Canterbury pilgrimage, the Wife’s use of textual authority needs more detailed examination. This essay will argue that the Wife’s citation of authority in her Prologue purposefully rejects traditional, often religious, textual interpretations to insert commonsensical or folk-wisdom interpretations and that these new interpretations undermine traditional authority through humorous criticism. I will discuss in detail the Wife’s citations of the biblical stories of the Samaritan woman, Abraham and Solomon.



Questions to Ask of Your Thesis During Development
1. Can you locate a sentence or two in your opening paragraph that states your thesis?
2. Can a counter-argument be mounted against your thesis?
3. How specific is your thesis?
4. How clear is the rest of your intro at mapping your essay and stating the importance of your thesis to current scholarship or to our understanding of the work?
5. How specific is your thesis?

Three Example Theses
Good: In this essay I will argue that The Wife of Bath’s Tale  raises questions about the importance of textual authority.
Better: In this essay I will argue that The Wife of Bath’s Tale raises questions about the importance of textual authority by allowing the Wife both to reject and make her own use of textual authority.
Most Specific: The Wife of Bath’s Tale confronts the issues of clerical authority over women by allowing the Wife both to reject textual authority and to undermine it at the same time. She explicitly claims she doesn’t need it and then goes one to use it in a seemingly bumbling and disorganized way, much as Chaucer’s own narratorial persona plays the role of the hack poet or the literal reporter, in order to make subversive claims while seeming not to.



Additional Options for Thesis Development

You may want to make explicit claims about your use of theory or your methodology: Your claims, examples, etc. will often reveal your methodology—scholars often omit an explicit discussion of their methodology or theoretical lens. However, more and more scholars are making an effort to reveal their theoretical positions more explicitly in order to be clearer.

Pros&Cons of Making Explicit Theory Claims:




Breaking out of the formula