Muses and the Gazette: Andrés Bello’s Poetics of Revolutionary News

 

Ronald Briggs

 

 

In a sonnet titled, “May God Keep Me in Glory” (Dios me tenga en gloria) (ca. 1818), Venezuelan intellectual Andrés Bello responds to the inaccurate trickle of revolutionary news that arrives in London from the Spanish American battlefields. Telling the story of an independence leader who safely escapes from South America to London only to learn that the “official gazette” of the Spanish government lists him as having been killed in battle along with all of his soldiers, the poem takes a sarcastic slant. The leader reads breathlessly the news of his own demise before finally exclaiming “May God keep me in glory” in an ironic self-epitaph.

 

Here it is the newspaper, that vehicle of the imagined community so central to Habermas and Anderson’s concepts of nationhood that proves an unreliable source of truth. Where journalism (and with it the Aristotelian concept of the historian) proves unable to deliver factual truth, the poet steps in, not to give an idealized version of history, but rather the real facts that the gazette prefers to avoid. The sonnet also carries the seeds of an argument for the implicit virtue of the revolutionary ethos, contrasting its own frankness with the deception practiced by colonial newspapers. Later, in “Frangments of a Poem Titled America” (Fragmentos de un poema titulado América), Bello asks the muses to leave Europe behind and take up residence in the Western hemisphere. For Bello, I will argue, the muses are needed to help with the revolutionary task of putting out a version of events designed to counter those offered by the colonialist press. Well acquainted with the generic hierarchy in which the poet occupies an elevated location as the deliverer of news whose truth claims are transcendent, Bello creates a powerful vision of the revolutionary poet as an inspired instrument more elevated and virtuous than the politically tainted gazette. Thus, the meta-poem in which the speaker describes the inadequacy of press coverage and the muses’ natural tendency to follow the revolutionary perspective puts the poem’s cultural capital to work as an argument for the virtue of the independence movement against the small-mindedness of its adversaries.